Skip to main content
Glama
ai-integr8tor

mcp-server-qdrant

by ai-integr8tor
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-server-qdrant

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-mem0

      schwarzesonne13
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for mem0 memory management backed by Qdrant, with per-collection isolation via HTTP headers. Enables storing, searching, updating, and deleting memories through natural language.
      -

    • better-qdrant-mcp

      jtsang4
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides long-term memory and semantic search using Qdrant and OpenAI embeddings, with tools for storing, searching, and managing knowledge.
      6
      57 PyPI
      1
      MIT

    • fortytwo-guide

      justfortytwo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A semantic-memory MCP server that stores text 'memories' with provenance and enables recall by meaning (vector search), keyword (FTS5), or structured filters.
      20 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: qdrant-find for retrieval and qdrant-store for storage. There is no ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent pattern with the 'qdrant-' prefix followed by a clear verb ('find', 'store'), making them predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only 2 tools, the server is minimal but it covers the core operations of storing and retrieving memories. It could benefit from additional tools like delete, but the count is appropriate for a simple memory store.

    Completeness3/5

    The server lacks update and delete operations, which are notable gaps for memory management. While store and find cover basic needs, agents may require more functionality for complete lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources