Skip to main content
Glama
ahnlabio

BICScan MCP Server

by ahnlabio

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
BICSCAN_API_KEYYesAPI key obtained from https://bicscan.io for accessing BICScan risk scoring and asset information.

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
get_risk_scoreB

Get Risk Score for Crypto, Domain Name, ENS, CNS, KNS or even Hostname Address

Args:
    address: EOA, CA, ENS, CNS, KNS or even HostName
Returns:
    Dict: where summary.bicscan_score is from 0 to 100. 100 is high risk.
get_assetsB

Get Assets holdings by CryptoAddress

Args:
    address: EOA, CA, ENS, CNS, KNS.
Returns:
    Dict: where assets is a list of assets

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3.3/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: get_assets retrieves asset holdings, while get_risk_score calculates risk scores. There is no overlap in functionality, and an agent can easily differentiate between them based on their names and descriptions.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with get_assets and get_risk_score. The naming is predictable and readable, using snake_case throughout without any deviations or mixed conventions.

Tool Count2/5

With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a BICScan MCP Server, which suggests a domain involving crypto and risk analysis. This limited set may not cover essential operations like querying transactions, checking contract details, or updating data, making it borderline inadequate for the apparent scope.

Completeness2/5

The tool surface has significant gaps for a crypto/risk analysis domain. While it includes asset retrieval and risk scoring, it lacks basic operations such as querying transaction histories, verifying contract addresses, or performing deeper analytics. This incompleteness could lead to agent failures when handling common tasks in this domain.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues