FinBrain MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to FinBrain MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides structured financial market data (stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, fundamentals, market indicators) to AI systems via MCP, enabling natural language access to financial datasets with both hosted and local deployment options.3119 npmISC

inferventisofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to access real-time financial data, news, and web reading through a single MCP endpoint with zero installation.-- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceFinancial intelligence MCP server exposing real market data, SEC filings, FinBERT sentiment, technical analysis, and macro/global market data as MCP tools — free tier issued instantly, no card required.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI agents access to 336 real-time and historical market, quant, SEC filing, insider trading, fundamentals, and macro data tools via MCP Streamable HTTP.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides 10 financial data tools (market data, economic indicators, news, insider trades, and calendars) via a single MCP layer, enabling any MCP-compatible LLM to access diverse financial data through a unified interface.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides real-time financial market lookups (stock quotes, volume, P/E ratios) and deterministic portfolio risk (VaR) calculations as standardized MCP endpoints for AI assistant integration.-
TDQS
Scored across 33 tools
The by_ticker, screener_, recent_, and available_ prefixes give most tools a clear scope, so the majority are unambiguous. A few pairs like options_put_call vs screener_put_call_ratio and news_by_ticker vs recent_news need closer attention, but the descriptions resolve the intended use.
Names mostly follow a consistent pattern of resource plus scope prefix/suffix, such as available_*, *_by_ticker, screener_*, and recent_*. The exceptions are minor but visible: options_put_call lacks a by_ticker suffix, and insider_transactions_by_ticker jumps to screener_insider_trading.
At 33 tools, this server is on the heavy side, largely because most datasets are exposed both as per-ticker endpoints and as screener endpoints. The count is not unreasonable for the broad financial-data domain, but it sits near the limit of what is easy to navigate.
The server provides discovery, per-ticker data, recent items, and screeners across a wide array of financial and alternative-data categories. Obvious gaps are minor: there is no screener for corporate lobbying, and a few category axes (market, region, ticker) are not applied uniformly across all tools.