Skip to main content
Glama
README.md
<p align="center">
  <img src="docs/assets/alibi-wordmark.svg" alt="Alibi - tracking where an agent went wrong" width="420">
</p>

# Alibi

[![CI](https://github.com/ahmedezz26/alibi/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/ahmedezz26/alibi/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
[![PyPI](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/agent-alibi.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/agent-alibi/)
[![License: MIT](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-blue.svg)](LICENSE)
[![Python 3.12+](https://img.shields.io/badge/python-3.12%2B-blue.svg)](pyproject.toml)

**We check whether your agent has an alibi for what it did.**

Alibi finds where a long AI-agent run went wrong. It borrows the playbook of automotive
driver-assistance systems: treat the run as a time series, filter it forward, detect the
fault, then smooth backward to the moment it began. The only sensor is Jev, TypeSafe AI's
System One model, which answers with calibrated probabilities instead of text.

It is built for long traces, where reading everything at once breaks down: on real coding
failures of 59K to 120K tokens, a single whole-trace read found the root-cause step in 0%
of cases; Alibi found it in 16% and 7.8%, and points to the right neighbourhood (within
3 steps) in 21% and 17%.

## How it works

```mermaid
flowchart LR
  A[Trace] --> B[10K-token chapters]
  B --> C[Forward filter:<br/>Jev rates each chapter]
  C -->|memory card| C
  C --> D[CUSUM alarm<br/>on health]
  D --> E[Look back from the alarm:<br/>chapter + per-step evidence]
  E --> F[Top 3 steps to read,<br/>earliest strong suspect first]
```

| Stage | What happens | Driver-assistance analogue |
|---|---|---|
| Chapters | 10K-token windows with overlap, read one at a time | Measurement frames |
| Forward filter | Jev rates health and 4 warning signs per chapter; a memory card of numbers carries state forward | Recursive filter (predict + update) |
| CUSUM | Accumulates health drift; the first alarm marks the failure chapter | Fault detection |
| Look-back | Re-reads the alarm chapter and every earlier one in parallel, with hindsight | Fixed-interval (RTS-style) smoothing |
| Pick | P(chapter) x evidence per step; the earliest step within 80% of the top score | Fault-onset estimation |

## What you get

A short trace is refused, without spending a call:

    $ alibi diagnose examples/sample_trace.json
    Trace is 219 tokens, under the 50,000-token threshold: a single direct read is
    enough; Alibi adds value on long traces.

A long one comes back as three steps to read, in order. This is a real run from the
locked TrajErrBench set (a Claude Opus coding agent failing on a qutebrowser issue),
replayed from its recorded result:

    $ alibi diagnose trace.json
    Read these 3 steps first, in order.
    80,778 tokens, 10 chapters, alarm at chapter 6; 17 Jev calls, 35 s, $0.0096
    1. step 74 (assistant), chapter 6, score 0.277
       'Now I see the full picture. The test on line 458 expects
        `str(proc.outcome) == 'Testprocess crashed.'` for SIGSEGV...'
    2. step 76 (assistant), chapter 6, score 0.202
       '## Phase 5: FIX ANALYSIS\n\nNow I have a clear understanding. Let me
        implement the changes to `guiprocess.py`...'
    3. step 78 (assistant), chapter 6, score 0.178
       'Now let me implement all the changes:\nTool calls:\nstr_replace_editor(...'

Step 74 is the labelled root cause: the agent reads the test wrong and every later
edit builds on that reading. Being right at rank 1 happens on 16% of these traces;
the honest claim is that three steps out of 118 is a much smaller haystack.

## Results

Locked test sets, each run once against a pass bar written down beforehand:

| Test set | Traces | Median length | Alibi exact step | Alibi within 3 steps | Whole-trace read, exact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TrajErrBench SWE-Bench Pro (real coding failures) | 56 | 59K tokens | 16% | 21% | 0% (p = 0.004) |
| LongRCA SWE-bench Pro (real coding failures) | 90 | 120K tokens | 7.8% | 16.7% | 0% (p = 0.016) |
| LongRCA WebArena (real web-task failures) | 48 | 38K tokens | 12.5% | 20.8% | 16.9% published (no clear difference) |

Against published methods on the LongRCA leaderboard (all on DeepSeek-V4-Flash; exact
root step, same 128 SWE-bench Pro failures):

| Method | Exact root step |
|---|---|
| RCTA | 38.3% |
| **Alibi (Jev)** | **10.2%** |
| ECHO | 7.8% |
| FALAT | 2.3% |
| All-at-once (whole trace) | 1.6% |
| Step-by-step | 0.8% |
| Binary search | 0.8% |

Alibi ties ECHO (Fisher p = 0.66) and trails RCTA (p < 0.000001), which traces each
suspect back to the handoff instruction between agents.

## When to use it, and when not to

- Use it for traces of tens of thousands of tokens or more (default gate: 50K tokens).
- Do not use it for short traces: a single direct read by any capable model is enough,
  and Alibi says so without spending a call.
- Treat the output as "read these 3 steps first", not as a verdict.

## Speed and cost

- Each chapter is one Jev call, and chapters are judged in parallel on the way back. A
  38K-token trace is 4.6 chapters and 15 seconds of judge time; a 120K-token trace is
  17 chapters and about 48 seconds. No reasoning tokens are generated.
- Cost scales with trace length: about $0.10 per million trace tokens at Jev's price of
  $0.042 per million input tokens (roughly $0.01 for a 100K-token trace).

## Install

Claude Code:

    /plugin marketplace add ahmedezz26/alibi
    /plugin install alibi@alibi

Set `TYPESAFE_API_KEY` in your environment (get a key from TypeSafe AI). The plugin starts
the MCP server itself with `uvx`, so there is nothing else to install. Then ask Claude Code
"why did my last session go wrong?" and it will find the session file, call the tool and
read the suspect steps back to you.

Command line (the PyPI distribution is `agent-alibi`; the import package is `alibi`):

    uv tool install agent-alibi
    export ALIBI_JUDGE_BACKEND=typesafe ALIBI_ALLOW_PAID_MODELS=1 TYPESAFE_API_KEY=...
    alibi diagnose path/to/trace.json

`ALIBI_ALLOW_PAID_MODELS=1` is the spend guard: Jev is a paid API, and without it the judge
refuses to run. The plugin sets both variables for you.

## What you can point it at

One trace per run. Three kinds are understood, and `--source auto` (the default) picks by
file extension.

**A JSON trace file** (`.json`) - a list of steps, oldest first. Every field is optional, but
include `outputs` and `error` where you have them: the judge reads the whole rendered step, and
a misread observation or an unfixed error is most of the signal the method looks for.

```json
[
  {"type": "llm",  "name": "plan",           "inputs": {"task": "Book the cheapest direct flight."},
                                             "outputs": {"text": "Plan: search, filter, pick."}},
  {"type": "tool", "name": "search_flights", "inputs": {"from": "CAI", "to": "BER"},
                                             "outputs": {"flights": []}},
  {"type": "tool", "name": "book",           "inputs": {"flight": "TK33"}, "error": "not direct"}
]
```

Recognised keys: `type` (free text: `llm`, `tool`, `assistant`, `user`, ...), `name`,
`inputs`, `outputs`, `error`, `step_id`, `timestamp` (ISO 8601). Steps are numbered by
position, so `step 74` in the output is the 75th entry in the file. `examples/sample_trace.json`
is a working example. If your agent writes some other format, convert it to this shape or add
a `TraceSource` adapter (see [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md)).

**A Claude Code session** (`.jsonl`) - the transcripts under
`~/.claude/projects/<project>/<session-id>.jsonl`, where `<project>` is your project's path
with slashes, underscores and dots turned into dashes (`/Users/me/LLM_projects/app` becomes
`-Users-me-LLM-projects-app`). To diagnose the most recent session of the project you are in:

    alibi diagnose "$(ls -t ~/.claude/projects/"${PWD//[\/_.]/-}"/*.jsonl | head -1)"

Parsing is best effort: the format is internal to Claude Code and may change. Assistant text,
tool calls and tool results become steps; thinking blocks are skipped.

**A LangSmith trace** - pass the trace id and the project, with `LANGSMITH_API_KEY` set:

    alibi diagnose <trace-id> --source langsmith --project "my-project"

There is no folder mode: Alibi diagnoses one run at a time, because the method is a filter
over a single time series. To sweep a directory, loop:

    for f in traces/*.json; do alibi diagnose "$f" --json > "${f%.json}.diagnosis.json"; done

## Reading the result

    Read these 3 steps first, in order.
    80,778 tokens, 10 chapters, alarm at chapter 6; 17 Jev calls, 35 s, $0.0096
    1. step 74 (assistant), chapter 6, score 0.277
       '...'

- **chapters** - how many 10K-token windows the trace was split into.
- **alarm at chapter N** - where CUSUM first saw the agent's health break down. The cause is
  usually at or before it, which is why the look-back starts there. `alarm at chapter None`
  means no alarm fired and the run's ending was used as the anchor instead.
- **score** - fused evidence for that step, not a probability. Only the ordering is meaningful.
- **steps** are 0-based positions in the trace you passed in.

`--json` prints the same thing as a JSON object (`gated`, `message`, `trace_tokens`,
`n_steps`, `n_chapters`, `alarm_chapter`, `anchor`, `suspects[]`, `judge_calls`,
`judge_seconds`, `cost_usd`) for piping into something else. Exit code is 0, or 2 if the trace
file is missing or unreadable, or if a trace needs the judge and the Jev backend is not
configured.

## The two gates, and what they cost

Nothing is sent anywhere, and nothing is spent, unless the trace falls between them:

| Trace size | What happens | Override |
|---|---|---|
| Under 50,000 tokens | Not analysed: "a single direct read is enough" | `--min-trace-tokens`, `ALIBI_MIN_TRACE_TOKENS` |
| 50,000 to 250,000 tokens | Analysed; about $0.01 per 100K tokens | |
| Over 250,000 tokens | Refused with an estimated cost, so a huge transcript cannot spend unannounced | `--max-trace-tokens`, `ALIBI_MAX_TRACE_TOKENS` |

## The MCP tool

The server (`alibi-mcp`, stdio) exposes exactly one tool for any MCP client, not just
Claude Code:

    diagnose_trace(trace: str, source: str = "auto", project: str | None = None) -> Diagnosis

`trace` is the same path or id the CLI takes. To wire it up by hand:

```json
{ "mcpServers": { "alibi": {
  "command": "uvx",
  "args": ["--from", "agent-alibi>=0.1,<0.2", "alibi-mcp"],
  "env": { "TYPESAFE_API_KEY": "...", "ALIBI_JUDGE_BACKEND": "typesafe",
           "ALIBI_ALLOW_PAID_MODELS": "1" } } } }
```

## Privacy

Traces above the length gate are sent to TypeSafe's API; below it, nothing leaves your
machine. There is no telemetry. Claude Code session parsing is best effort: the transcript
format is internal to Claude Code and may change. Session transcripts often contain source
code and secrets, so read [SECURITY.md](SECURITY.md) before diagnosing one.

## Contributing

See [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md). Plumbing, adapters, bug fixes and docs are welcome as
ordinary pull requests; changes to the estimation method need a pre-registered measurement,
for the reason the research log makes obvious.

## Background

Alibi started as an experiment by an ADAS engineer: can the tracking filters used in cars
work on AI-agent traces? The research log with every pre-registered test, including the
ones that failed, is in [docs/research-log.md](docs/research-log.md).

## License

MIT

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of selecting between overlapping tools. The tool's purpose is clearly distinct by virtue of being the only resource.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name follows a clean verb_noun pattern (diagnose_trace). Consistency is trivially maintained with no mixed conventions.

Tool Count4/5

A one-tool server is below the typical 3-15 range, but the narrow focus on trace diagnosis justifies a minimal surface. The tool is substantial and non-trivial, so the low count feels only slightly thin rather than inadequate.

Completeness5/5

For the stated purpose of diagnosing AI traces, the tool covers the full workflow: reading gated segments, detecting anomalies, and pointing to the key steps. No obvious missing operations are apparent within the narrow domain.

Maintenance

ActivityNo data
ResponsivenessNo issues