get_counter_recommendation

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description only states the return values but does not disclose any behavioral traits like read-only nature, auth requirements, or rate limits. As the sole source of behavioral info, it is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with key information. No superfluous words. Perfectly concise for the tool complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate but lacks detail on return format or what 'virtues' includes. Could be improved with an example or output structure hint.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description must compensate. It adds context that the ID is for a dhikr, but does not explain what a dhikr ID looks like or where to obtain it. Minimal additional value beyond the property title.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'Return', resource 'recommended repetition count and virtues for a specific dhikr', and identification method 'by its ID'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_morning_adhkar by focusing on a single dhikr recommendation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_morning_adhkar or get_dua_by_topic. No prerequisites or exclusions mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.