call_webhook_get
Executes a GET request to a webhook URL to trigger an n8n workflow or external service.
Instructions
Call a GET webhook
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | The webhook URL to call |
Executes a GET request to a webhook URL to trigger an n8n workflow or external service.
Call a GET webhook
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | The webhook URL to call |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided to disclose safety or side effects. Description only states action, not behavior like idempotency, timeouts, error handling, or data effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single, concise sentence. While minimal, it is appropriately sized for a simple tool with one parameter. No unnecessary information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and minimal description, the tool lacks completeness. No information on return values, URL validation, or behavior expectations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with parameter 'url' described. Description adds no extra meaning beyond schema, meeting baseline expectation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description explicitly states verb 'call' and resource 'GET webhook', clearly differentiating from sibling 'call_webhook_post' by specifying HTTP method.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'call_webhook_post' or when not to use it. Lacks context for selecting among siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ahmadsoliman/mcp-n8n-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server