Skip to main content
Glama
ahmadadam97

ledger-mcp

by ahmadadam97

Related Servers

Alternatives to ledger-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with a double-entry ledger, offering tools for account management, balanced journal entries, balance queries, trial balance, and penny-perfect allocation. Built with safety by construction: no update/delete tools, idempotent posting, and an append-only journal.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides financial audit reporting and ledger query tools for AI agents, enabling generation of compliance, risk, and transaction reports and querying of transaction data, balances, and summaries from an in-memory SQLite database via MCP.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Double-entry accounting ledger MCP server for autonomous agents that enables creating accounts, posting journal entries, and generating financial reports.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for hledger that exposes double-entry accounting tools to AI agents, enabling balance queries, transaction history, budget reports, and adding transactions to a journal.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to operate a self-hosted financial platform over MCP, managing books, expenses, revenues, settlements, payments, accounts, categories, transfers, positions, and cash flow with idempotent and audited writes.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A personal financial management tool that enables AI assistants to record transactions, check balances, and provide monthly financial summaries via the Model Context Protocol. It allows users to manage their expenses and income through natural language interactions using standardized MCP tools and resources.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action—account creation, transaction recording, balance retrieval, and reconciliation—with no overlapping responsibilities. The purposes are clearly separated, leaving no ambiguity for an agent to misselect.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tool names follow the verb_noun pattern (create_account, record_transaction, get_balance), but 'reconcile' is a single verb without a noun object. This minor deviation is not confusing but breaks the otherwise consistent pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a focused ledger server, covering the essential operations of account creation, transaction recording, balance queries, and reconciliation. Each tool earns its place without redundancy.

    Completeness3/5

    The core workflow (create account, record transaction, get balance, reconcile) is present, but notable gaps exist: there is no way to list accounts or view transaction history, and no update/delete operations for accounts or transactions. These missing read/audit functions could hinder some workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues