Skip to main content
Glama
ahbidabs

bucket-mcp

by ahbidabs
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to bucket-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • open-brain-mcp

      uwek
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for storing and retrieving thoughts, notes, and ideas with semantic vector search, enabling integration with Claude Desktop and other MCP clients.
      MIT

    • URL Fetch MCP

      aelaguiz
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables Claude or other LLMs to fetch content from URLs, supporting HTML, JSON, text, and images with configurable request parameters.
      3
      3
      MIT

    • braintube-mcp

      lildaddyo
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Persistent knowledge-base MCP server. Semantic search with source citations over saved YouTube videos, podcasts, articles and PDFs — one endpoint for every MCP-capable AI client.
      28
      -

    • memex

      dioniipereyraa
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that indexes Claude.ai chats and local Claude Code sessions, enabling semantic and keyword search across all your conversations with Claude.
      6
      6
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a distinct purpose: search, list recent, get detail, download video, and save. There is no overlap in actions or resources, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (search_bucket, get_item, download_video, save_to_bucket), but 'list_recent' omits the noun and 'save_to_bucket' includes a preposition, creating a minor inconsistency. Overall, the style is still predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a content saving and retrieval service. Each tool covers a distinct operation without unnecessary redundancy, and the count falls comfortably within the ideal range.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers the main workflow (save, search, list, get detail, download) but lacks a delete operation, which is a fundamental part of managing saved content. This is a notable gap that could force agents to leave items in the bucket indefinitely.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources