Skip to main content
Glama
ahamdjin

Automation Auditor MCP

by ahamdjin
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Automation Auditor MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ci-guard-mcp

      carelessdept
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run deterministic, read-only local repository audits for risky GitHub workflows, undocumented environment variables, possible credentials, and conflicting dependency configuration, returning structured findings without sending source code to a service.
      45 npm
      MIT

    • mcp-audit

      saagpatel
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Audits MCP server configurations for security risks including capability inventory, SSRF, prompt injection, and drift detection. Works in read-only mode and can also be used as an MCP server to let AI agents audit their own attack surface.
      132 PyPI
      4
      MIT

    • toolfence

      dhb520cat
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents and CI pipelines to audit MCP servers and agent tool-chains by statically scanning repositories, local checkouts, tools/list exports, or live endpoints for risks such as destructive actions without confirmation, mismatched safety annotations, injection surfaces, credential or PII exposure, and unguarded command, path, or URL sinks. All checks are read-only and never execute the scanned code or call tools/call.
      3
      MIT

    • emo-cyber-agent

      SE-Emam
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible agent hosts to delegate governed, read-only security audits and reviews of code, applications, agents, prompts, MCP configurations, and cloud environments through evidence-first findings and stable schemas.
      33 PyPI
      2
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct artifact or operation: workflow exports, platform capabilities, OpenAPI specs, and URL preflight. No two tools overlap in purpose, and the descriptions explicitly separate their scopes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use lowercase snake_case with a verb_noun structure: audit_workflow, list_supported_platforms, audit_openapi, preflight_url. The pattern is predictable and consistent throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a focused, read-only auditor. Each tool earns its place by covering a distinct audit target without redundancy or unnecessary surface area.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core auditing tasks: workflow platforms, OpenAPI, and URL preflight, with a helper to list supported platforms. Minor gaps exist—no batch reporting or deeper security/runtime checks—but these are documented limitations rather than missing tools for the stated v1 purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources