A
licenseA
qualityA
maintenanceEnables reading and writing Huly documents and issues from MCP clients like Claude Desktop and Claude Code, including document CRUD, search, issue reading, and commenting.
12
1
AGPL 3.0
handbook-mcp-server
by ah-oh
Related Servers
Alternatives to handbook-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to access a team's handbook (markdown repository) through listing, reading, and searching documents, helping standardize processes and troubleshooting.3-
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude Desktop to autonomously perform HR operations such as employee onboarding, leave management, meeting scheduling, ticket creation, and email notifications through MCP tool calling.12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceFull Windows desktop access for Claude and other MCP clients, enabling screen capture, UI Automation, window/process management, file operations, and shell commands under a tiered permission model.32 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to interact with collaborative Docs instances, providing document management, content editing, access control, and AI-powered transformations via MCP.1MIT
- FlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables managing Logto resources (users, applications, organizations, roles) via MCP clients like Cursor or Claude Desktop.261-
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing all entries, retrieving by ID, creating, updating, getting an app-specific overview, and searching tags. No overlapping functionality.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent 'handbook_verb_noun' pattern using snake_case, making it easy to predict tool names.
Tool Count5/5
Six tools is appropriate for a handbook management server, covering core CRUD operations plus overview and tag search without being excessive.
Completeness3/5
CRUD is missing delete functionality, and there is no tool to toggle an entry's active status independently, leaving a notable gap in lifecycle management.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues