calculate_sum
Add two numbers and get their sum. Provide two numeric inputs to compute the total.
Instructions
Calculates the sum of two numbers.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | Yes | First number | |
| b | Yes | Second number |
Add two numbers and get their sum. Provide two numeric inputs to compute the total.
Calculates the sum of two numbers.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | Yes | First number | |
| b | Yes | Second number |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the tool is a calculation (no side effects), which is sufficient for a simple mathematical operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence that conveys the essential information without any wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple two-parameter tool with no output schema required, the description is adequate. It covers the core functionality, and the schema covers the parameters.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with clear descriptions ('First number', 'Second number'). The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, achieving the baseline for high coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the specific action ('calculates') and the resource ('sum of two numbers'). It is unambiguous and directly conveys the tool's function.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidelines are provided. However, since there are no sibling tools, the need for explicit alternatives is reduced. The description implies usage from the name but offers no additional context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/agiulucom42-del/mcp-boilerplate'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server