agirails_submit_quote

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations indicate a write operation (readOnlyHint false) and no destructiveness, but the description adds confusion by stating it 'Returns a TypeScript snippet' without explaining the side effect or actual submission behavior. Important details like authentication, rate limits, or the snippet's role are omitted.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that front-loads the main action and state transition. However, the phrase 'Returns a TypeScript snippet' may be unnecessary or misleading, slightly reducing efficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Without an output schema, the description should clarify the return value and side effects, but it only vaguely mentions a snippet. It fails to explain the purpose of estimatedDelivery and network, or how the snippet is used, leaving significant gaps for a tool with 5 parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers 60% of parameters with descriptions; the description reinforces price and deliverables but adds no new detail for estimatedDelivery or network, which lack schema descriptions. It partially compensates but does not fully bridge the gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool submits a price quote and transitions a service from INITIATED to QUOTED, which aligns with the name. However, the mention of 'Returns a TypeScript snippet' introduces ambiguity about whether the tool actually performs the submission or only generates code, slightly reducing clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for providers responding to a service request, but it does not explicitly distinguish it from sibling tools like agirails_accept_quote (for buyers) or provide when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.