Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to urssaf-vigilance-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to check a site, e-mail, phone number, IBAN, or SIREN against public sources and receive sourced anti-scam signals in French. The same checks are available remotely over MCP and locally via stdio, sharing the HTTP API's key and quota.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      eu-verify lets AI agents verify any European business partner: company existence (official French SIREN registry), insolvency records (BODACC), EU VAT validation before invoicing (VIES), SIRET/IBAN/LEI checks, address and email verification, French business-day deadlines and EU public tenders. 10 paid MCP tools + a free catalog tool, plus 81 HTTP endpoints. Each call costs $0.001-$0.01 in USDC on
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables checking Québec contractors in one call — RBQ licence status, RENA debarment, environmental penalties, and SEAO public contracts — returning a deterministic ok/review/blocking/not_found verdict with sources. Paid per-call tools add web search with full page text and business verification against sanctions, corporate registries, and GLEIF data.
      2
      48 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables converting Indian GST tax invoices into government INV-01 JSON payloads via OCR and deterministic extraction, with tools to validate GSTINs and re-validate payloads, and reports exactly what it couldn't read.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables verification of Japanese companies through JP-Verify's API: checking qualified-invoice registration (T-numbers) and Corporate Numbers, resolving company names to candidate numbers, retrieving official or romanised English names and addresses, and fetching major-shareholder tables from EDINET filings. Supports single or batch lookups with API-key or key-less sandbox access, returning raw responses plus quota and provenance metadata.
      4
      21 PyPI
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    verifier_attestation and verifier_attestations differ only by a trailing 's', which is a real misselection risk despite the batch description. controler_attestation also overlaps heavily with lire_attestation_pdf + verifier_attestation since it performs both internally, though its composite verdict purpose is described. The suivi_* group is reasonably distinct.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The attestation tools use verb_noun (verifier_attestation, lire_attestation_pdf, controler_attestation) while the tracking tools invert to noun_verb (suivi_lister, suivi_verifier, suivi_creer_modele). Names remain readable and grouped by prefix, but the mixed verb/noun ordering and singular/plural pair deviate from a single convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each covers a distinct step (single check, batch check, PDF extraction, full control, listing, batch verification, template creation, connector status). No filler tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full attestation lifecycle: extraction, verification, cross-check verdicts, Excel tracking, batch re-verification, template creation, and connector config. Minor gaps like updating/removing individual tracking rows or exporting results are not surfaced but can be worked around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues