Skip to main content
Glama
aghasalim

groundcheck-mcp

by aghasalim
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to groundcheck-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-citation-checker

      ethanchand
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that verifies whether a claim is actually supported by the source text at a given citation — independent of what the calling LLM asserts.
      MIT

    • openclaw-output-vetter-mcp

      temurkhan13
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for verifying AI agent claims vs reality — single-transcript inline grounding-check that flags when an agent's response states facts not in the input context, when its code silently swallows exceptions and substitutes mock data, or when its multi-turn transcript contains contradictions or unverified completion claims. Sub-second, local, free, no API calls.
      4
      44 PyPI
      1
      MIT

    • llm-sidecar

      awaistechnologist
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for grounded, cited AI: answers questions from live web sources, verifies claims, fact-checks documents, searches and reads URLs, summarises, classifies, and extracts fields, with usage tracking and status.
      37 PyPI
      1
      MIT

    • xrad

      narimannemo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides an MCP server for storing and querying knowledge as verifiable claims, enforcing evidence-backed assertions with exact quotes and refusing paraphrases or unsupported relations.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool verifies a distinct artifact type: web-page quote, arXiv/DOI identifier, Python snippet output, local repo content, and arithmetic. The input types and returned verdicts differ clearly, so an agent can pick the right tool without overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All five tools follow an identical check_<noun> pattern (check_quote, check_citation, check_code, check_repo, check_math). This is a fully predictable, uniform convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a claim-verification server, with each tool earning its place by covering a different source of unverified assertions. No redundancy or filler.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the main verification targets (quotes, citations, code, repo contents, math) and returns actionable verdicts. Minor gaps exist, such as no standalone URL-liveness check or batch/multi-source verification, but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources