Skip to main content
Glama
agentspan-ai

MCP Test Server

by agentspan-ai

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Test Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Python MCP server implemented from scratch, providing tool execution capabilities like system time and file hashing via stdio or HTTP transport.
      2
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Automated testing tool for MCP servers that checks protocol conformance, tool quality, and reliability, providing a scorecard with spec citations and non-zero exit codes for CI.
      7 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A test server implementing all features of the MCP protocol, including prompts, tools, resources, and sampling, designed for testing MCP clients rather than practical applications.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server framework featuring dynamic tool loading and a modular one-tool-per-file architecture for rapid development. It supports both Stdio and HTTP transport modes, offering automated test generation and centralized configuration management.
      11
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 65 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, and the category prefixes make selection unambiguous. Even the many echo_* variants map to discrete test behaviors rather than overlapping functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use a consistent snake_case pattern with a category prefix (string_, collection_, encoding_, etc.) and a clear action or property. There are no mixed conventions or ambiguous verb styles.

    Tool Count1/5

    65 tools is far beyond a reasonable scoped set for any server. While a test server may intentionally exercise many capabilities, the sheer volume suggests many tools are redundant test variants rather than each earning a place for a cohesive purpose.

    Completeness3/5

    Coverage is broad across utility categories, but notable gaps exist: no string trim/substring, no general collection filter/map, no datetime now/timezone, no math sqrt/trig, etc. For a utility/test grab-bag, agents can work around many gaps but the surface is not complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues