Skip to main content
Glama
agentlabbusiness

intesta-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to intesta-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to invoke registry-governed, fail-closed tools such as requesting child tasks in other domains, reporting results, querying a domain's context and contracts, and submitting or approving plans. All work is gated on real evidence (analysis, independent review, actual test runs), so a task can never be marked done without proof.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and agents to perform read-only lookups of dated on-record facts about agents, wallets, and endpoints, including evidence levels and history, so they can assess what is known before paying or relying on them.
      4
      0
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to check trustworthiness before recommending URLs, products, or organizations, with fail-closed pass/fail verdicts and attested-only recommendations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to get read-only trust verdicts on knowledge records by evaluating evidence maturity, provenance, intended use, risk level, and scope before deciding whether knowledge may be used.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify links and payments for scam risk before acting, returning deterministic allow/ask/deny verdicts with scores, reasons, and warnings using local checks.
      3
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to safely inspect a local repository's code and metadata while blocking private data from leaving the machine, providing read-only tools for search, change tracking, and integrity verification.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct step in the trust workflow: discovery via search_registry, trust assessment via check_trust, fact retrieval via get_facts, grounded Q&A via ask_entity, and interpretation via trust_ladder. Boundaries are clear, and descriptions explicitly guide when to use each tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names use a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (search_registry, check_trust, get_facts, ask_entity). The one outlier is trust_ladder, which is noun-based rather than verb-based, but the overall convention remains readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a trust registry lookup server. Each tool has a clear purpose and no unnecessary redundancy, supporting a focused read-oriented workflow.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the core lifecycle: find entities, check trust, read facts, ask grounded questions, and explain the trust ladder. A minor gap is the lack of an explicit tool to verify returned passport signatures or hashes offline, though the descriptions suggest this can be done externally.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues