AgenticSettle Verify
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to AgenticSettle Verify
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables deterministic verification of AI agent decisions and actions, providing PASS/FAIL/ABSTAIN verdicts with replayable proofs and an optional signed receipt ledger.3 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceIndependent trust scores, claim audits, and side-by-side comparisons for AI agents, queryable over MCP. Every verdict is backed by hands-on testing and signed evidence from Hlido (hlido.eu). Hosted endpoint available at https://hlido.eu/mcp — no auth required.14MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceCertification authority for AI agents. Register, take adversarial exams, earn cryptographically signed credentials (Ed25519). Get paid to examine other agents. 20,000 free credits on registration — no payment needed to start.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceScore your agent's governance (0-100), lint MCP tool definitions, and estimate costs across all major models. Free diagnostic tools with no API key needed. Expert skill files on governance, economics, and system architecture available with free tier.81MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to obtain independent, Ed25519-signed receipts confirming real-world facts: whether a page is online, a domain is legitimate, an email address is deliverable, a heartbeat was declared, or a scheduled task actually ran. Each response includes a verifiable cryptographic receipt, so agents can prove to their users that an asserted outcome was observed by a neutral third party rather than self-attested.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceTrust layer for agent work: verify the artifact an AI agent produced, meter what the run actually cost, and keep the agent inside its mandate. Signed receipts verify offline. 20 checks/day free, then 0.005 USDC per call or $49 per environment per month. Locales: en, hi.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: verify_output submits content for verification, check_verdict retrieves a specific result, get_insights tracks agent performance, list_verifications searches records, submit_feedback and submit_appeal handle user-side actions. No two tools have overlapping functionality.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (verify_output, check_verdict, get_insights, list_verifications, submit_feedback, list_criteria_templates, get_manager_alerts). The naming is predictable and clearly conveys the action and resource involved.
With 9 tools, the set is well-scoped for the domain of AI output verification. Each tool serves a necessary function in the verification, retrieval, feedback, and appeal lifecycle without redundancy or bloat.
The tool surface covers the full verification lifecycle: submitting output, retrieving results, listing history, checking appeals, tracking agent performance, providing feedback, and browsing templates. No obvious gaps exist for the stated purpose of verifying AI-generated content.