get_replenishment_offers

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that the tool is a read-only operation ('Live and historical status') and clarifies it is an 'introspection stub' calling a hosted endpoint. This provides useful behavioral context beyond the missing annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two efficient sentences: first defines the tool's purpose and scope, second clarifies its stub nature. No redundant words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read tool with no output schema, the description lacks details on the return format or content of offer status. While sufficient for basic selection, further context would be helpful.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All 7 parameters have schema descriptions (100% coverage), so the description adds no additional meaning. The baseline of 3 applies as the schema already documents parameters adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool is for reading 'Live and historical Subscribe and Save replenishment offer status', specifying a verb (get), resource (replenishment offers), and context (Subscribe and Save). It distinguishes from sibling tools by targeting a specific inventory domain.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_inventory_health or get_fba_inventory. The description only states it's a hosted endpoint stub, which is behavioral, not usage advice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.