Skip to main content
Glama
agent-blueprint

Agent Blueprint

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to Agent Blueprint

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Autonomous spec-to-product coding-agent CLI. Its MCP server exposes 34 tools over stdio: project state and task-queue ops, memory retrieve/store, code search, quality and verification reports, repo hotspots/co-changes, and structured findings/learnings.
      1,179 npm
      1,068
      Business Source 1.1
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Agent-first skill marketplace MCP server. AI agents discover, install, and share skills across 7 platforms via MCP protocol. 15 tools including skill search, download, upload, and agent discovery.
      18
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      D
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      The intelligent execution layer for coding agents, exposed as an MCP server for high-stakes engineering projects. It enables AI agents to manage plans, tasks, and integrations via tool calls.
      25
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This MCP server provides a local-first control plane for coding agents, enabling task routing, contract management, and shared learning across multiple AI vendors via markdown files.
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct entity or action (profile, blueprint, use case, etc.), with clear descriptions that differentiate similar operations like get_blueprint (summary) vs download_blueprint (full data). No two tools appear to overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 23 tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_business_profile, list_blueprints, sync_implementation_state). The naming is predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count4/5

    23 tools is slightly above the typical well-scoped range of 3-15, but the complexity of managing blueprints, profiles, use cases, implementation plans, and progress tracking justifies the count. Each tool serves a necessary function.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the full lifecycle from profile creation to implementation tracking, including financial recalculation and metric reporting. Minor gaps like missing delete operations exist, but the core workflow is well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive