Skip to main content
Glama
agenson-tools

Web Content Extractor MCP Server

by agenson-tools
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Web Content Extractor MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • cleanfetch

      belzorash
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read web pages reliably, returning clean markdown content, hyperlinks, and metadata without navigation or ad noise.
      3
      6 npm
      MIT

    • webclaw

      0xMassi
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Web content extraction for AI agents. 10 tools: scrape, crawl, map, batch, extract, summarize, diff, brand, search, research. Uses TLS fingerprinting to bypass anti-bot without a headless browser. Outputs LLM-optimized markdown with 67% fewer tokens than raw HTML.
      10
      2,360
      AGPL 3.0

    • scrape-mcp

      guanyuyan
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to fetch real web pages while automatically bypassing anti-bot protections, login walls, and JS rendering, then returns clean, token-efficient article content.
      4
      MIT

    • Crawlberg MCP Server

      xberg-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to crawl and scrape websites, converting HTML to clean Markdown and structured metadata with support for JavaScript rendering, bot evasion, and SSRF protection.
      178
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of web content extraction: article text, structured data, links, visual layout, and batch processing. No overlapping purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., extract_article, screenshot_to_markdown). The naming is predictable and clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    5 tools is an ideal number for this server's scope, covering all major content extraction needs without being excessive or too sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers article extraction, structured data, links, visual rendering, and batch processing. A minor gap is the lack of a unified 'extract all' tool, but the current surface is comprehensive for most use cases.

    Resources