Skip to main content
Glama
agaskell

interp-playground

by agaskell

Related Servers

Alternatives to interp-playground

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to inspect and test other MCP servers by listing and calling their tools, reading resources, and getting prompts. Supports stdio, SSE, and HTTP transports for both local and remote MCP server inspection.
      7
      4 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables local Apple on-device Foundation Model access via any MCP client, supporting text generation, structured output, and multi-turn chat on macOS.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local MCP server that enables AI clients to read and search memories from the Fovea macOS app, with privacy-focused local operation and optional semantic search.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A terminal live-tail and a browser dashboard — one process, one event stream, served from localhost. Unified timeline across Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, Hermes, and OpenClaw. Token + cost accounting, compaction + anomaly detection, hybrid search, SVG call graphs, monaco-style diff attribution, agent-aware replay ("what would the agent say if I edited the prompt?"), policy editor, MCP s
      16 npm
      15
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no risk of selecting the wrong tool; its purpose is unambiguous. The internally complex output does not create tool-selection overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The sole tool name run_prompt follows a clear verb_noun snake_case convention. There are no other names to contradict the pattern, so consistency is trivially maintained.

    Tool Count2/5

    One tool is very thin for a server branded as a playground. While the operation is rich, the absence of companion tools for discovery, comparison, or feature inspection makes the count feel too low for the apparent scope.

    Completeness2/5

    The surface covers only running a prompt and viewing active SAE features. It lacks obvious operations such as listing models/layers, searching or inspecting individual features, or comparing prompts, leaving significant gaps for an interpretability playground.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues