remove_country_region_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It mentions `Raises: BingWebmasterError` but does not disclose other behavioral aspects: whether removal is permanent, if there are side effects, rate limits, or required permissions. It also doesn't describe the return value, which is crucial for a mutation operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with a docstring format, listing parameters and exceptions. It's appropriately sized for the tool's complexity. However, the parameter descriptions are minimal, and the Raises section could be more informative, but overall it's efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has a nested object parameter (`settings` with a defined schema) and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain the structure of `settings` or how to construct it for removal, nor does it describe the return value or side effects. The output schema exists but is not referenced. It's adequate but has gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. The description lists the two parameters (site_url, settings) but provides no additional detail beyond their names. The schema defines `settings` as a complex object with a required structure, but the description does not explain how to specify the settings to remove, such as whether partial objects are accepted or which fields are needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the verb 'Remove' and the resource 'country/region settings from a specific site', which is clear. It is distinguishable from siblings like 'add_country_region_settings' and 'get_country_region_settings' by the verb. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from other 'remove_' tools, but the resource is specific enough.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies it is used to remove settings, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'add_country_region_settings' or 'get_country_region_settings'. It lacks context on prerequisites, such as whether the site must be verified or settings must exist.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.