doc-bot

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It indicates a destructive action ('Remove'), which is useful, but lacks details on permissions needed, whether the removal is reversible, or any rate limits. The description adds some context but doesn't fully disclose behavioral traits beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose and followed by a usage tip. Every sentence earns its place by providing essential information without redundancy, making it efficient and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (a destructive operation with one parameter) and no annotations or output schema, the description is reasonably complete. It covers purpose, usage guidelines, and parameter context, though it could benefit from more behavioral details like confirmation prompts or error handling.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema description coverage for the single parameter, the schema already documents 'docsetId' well. The description adds value by explaining how to obtain this ID ('Get this from list_docsets command'), providing practical guidance beyond the schema's technical definition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action ('Remove') and resource ('an installed documentation set'), distinguishing it from siblings like 'add_docset' (adds) and 'list_docsets' (lists). It precisely communicates what the tool does without being vague or tautological.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly provides when to use this tool ('Remove an installed documentation set') and includes a clear alternative ('Use list_docsets first to see available docsets and their IDs'), guiding the agent on prerequisites and distinguishing it from other tools like 'add_docset' or 'refresh_documentation'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.