Skip to main content
Glama
afikrim

x-mcp-server

by afikrim

reply_to_tweet

Reply to a public X (Twitter) post using its URL or numeric status ID. Provide your reply text to directly respond to the tweet.

Instructions

Reply to an existing post.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
textYesThe reply body (max 280 characters on standard accounts).
url_or_idYesA full post URL or the bare numeric status id to reply to.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNoNumeric status id of the created/affected post, if resolvable.
okYesWhether the action completed successfully.
urlNoPermalink to the created/affected post, if any.
actionYesThe action that was attempted, e.g. 'post_tweet'.
messageNoHuman-readable detail about the outcome.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It does not disclose character limit (though in schema), rate limits, or error handling for non-existent tweets.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single, front-loaded sentence with no superfluous words. Efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite presence of output schema, the description lacks usage context, behavioral traits, and guidance on when to use this vs. 'post_tweet'. Minimal for a 2-param tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear parameter descriptions. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, achieving baseline score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Reply to an existing post', distinguishing it from siblings like 'post_tweet' (new tweet) and 'like_tweet'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance; differentiation from 'post_tweet' is implicit. No prerequisites mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/afikrim/x-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server