list_sveltekit_load_actions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It reveals the tool returns load/action details including error handling and params, but it does not explicitly state whether the operation is read-only or requires the project to be loaded first. The lack of side-effect disclosure is a minor gap for a listing tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that front-loads the core purpose and key detail categories. It has no filler or redundant content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with one parameter, the description provides essential context about scope (per route) and content (throw error/fail/redirect/params). However, it does not explicitly state the return format or the prerequisite that the project must be loaded, which would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides full description coverage for the single 'name' parameter (100%). The description adds no additional parameter semantics, so it relies entirely on the schema, which meets the baseline expectation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool's purpose: it lists load functions and actions from +page.server.ts and +layout.server.ts files per route, with specific details like throw error, fail, redirect, and params. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like list_sveltekit_routes, which focus on routes themselves.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used to inspect SvelteKit load/actions per route, but it does not explicitly state when to choose this over sibling tools like list_sveltekit_routes or list_sveltekit_server_hooks. No exclusions or alternative recommendations are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.