Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Homespun

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to render interactive user interfaces such as forms, dashboards, charts, tables, and wizards directly in MCP-compatible clients. Supports structured data collection and richer interactions beyond text responses.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to create multi-field forms, send approval requests via email, and retrieve structured human responses. It facilitates human-in-the-loop workflows by allowing agents to collect data and check form completion status.
      681 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to render native-looking floating dialogs and forms on the user's desktop, capturing user interactions like button clicks and form inputs.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to submit tasks for human or AI review and receive decisions via MCP tools, adding human review checkpoints to workflows.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to ask clarification questions and receive structured user input through a Human-in-the-Loop interface.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools cover distinct aspects of the Pane system: identity, attachments, pane lifecycle, records, templates, etc. Some overlap exists between update_record and upsert_record, and between delete_pane and trash, but descriptions clarify the differences. Overall, an agent can reasonably distinguish between tools.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Mixed naming conventions: some tools use verb_noun (create_pane, delete_pane, list_records), while others are single-word nouns (agent, attachments, feedback, key, trash, taste) with action enums inside. This inconsistency could cause confusion, though each tool's purpose is clear.

    Tool Count3/5

    26 tools is on the higher side but not unreasonable for the server's scope covering panes, records, templates, attachments, identity, and more. Some tools could potentially be consolidated (e.g., trash could be part of pane/template operations), but the count is still manageable.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers CRUD for panes, records, templates, and attachments, plus identity management, event polling, and feedback. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit tool to list all templates requires using template's search action), but core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing