Skip to main content
Glama
adventist-gc

laserfiche-mcp

by adventist-gc

Related Servers

Alternatives to laserfiche-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to securely search and list internal company documents via MCP tools, so they can answer employee questions based on current internal documentation.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and read the files a user can access, including full-text matches inside PDFs and office documents, through read-only MCP tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to connect local knowledge bases, preview and index selected directories, search for traceable snippets with source metadata, and read indexed document versions through MCP tools.
      6
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables document conversion and processing through an MCP server interface for AI assistants.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query documents in a Bedrock Knowledge Base through the MCP protocol, with tools for semantic search and agentic retrieval.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The six search tools (search_entries, search_content, search_natural, search_by_name, plus the name/path resolvers) have overlapping purposes despite descriptions that mostly route between them; the repeated warnings about which to use ('prefer search_content when...', 'search_entries = raw query') signal genuine ambiguity that an agent can misfire on. Task tools are also muddled: get_task_status, wait_for_task, and task_update all do the same underlying job with different timeout semantics.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow verb_noun (entry_get, field_values_get, folder_list, document_get_edoc) but verbs are inconsistently placed: entry_get vs get_field_values vs document_find_duplicates vs task_wait. The description of task_update explicitly acknowledges the naming breaks its own convention (a '_update' that is not a write). Readable, but not a predictable pattern.

    Tool Count2/5

    23 tools is heavy for what is essentially a document-repository surface, and the count is inflated by redundant aggregation: four search tools, three task-status tools (get_task_status, wait_for_task, task_update covering the same payload), and near-duplicate definition listers. Several tools collapse into one another, so the set carries more names than distinct operations.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad: entry read/write, folder listing, document text/edoc/image retrieval, duplicate detection, field/tag/template/link/audit metadata, and async task tracking. Missing write-side operations (create/move/rename/delete are implied by siblings like delete_entry but not all listed here) and no update for entry attributes, but the core CRUD and lifecycle are largely present.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessWithin a week