Skip to main content
Glama
adsandcode

mcp-server-contentgate

by adsandcode

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-server-contentgate

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with WordPress sites over MCP, providing read-only tools for AEO/GEO readiness, AI visibility, traffic, request logs, bot identification, page checks, and schema/markdown previews, plus opt-in write tools to draft, edit, and publish posts with permission checks and auditing.
      1
      GPL 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables editorial content QA over the Model Context Protocol with four local tools that analyze readability, AI-sounding language, SEO on-page factors, and produce full reports where every finding includes an actionable fix.
      4
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to capture screenshots, run visual diffs, accessibility audits, and batch sweep plans for web pages via MCP tools.
      14 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to audit URLs or raw HTML for SEO, AEO, and GEO performance, generate llms.txt manifests, and check the tool version via MCP tools.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides on-page SEO analysis via MCP tools, including page audits, schema extraction, robots.txt checks, sitemap parsing, and link analysis. No API keys required; works with any MCP-compatible client.
      5
      19 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct content-quality dimension: keyword presence, translation structure, internal linking, advertising claims, sitemap lastmod dating, and hashing. Even the two hashing-related tools are cleanly separated as utility versus policy. No tool appears to duplicate another.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Four tools follow a clear check_<object> pattern, but sitemap_lastmod and content_hash break the verb-first convention and read as nouns. The mixed style is still readable and predictable enough for moderate coherence.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a content-gate server, covering distinct compliance checks plus hashing support. Each tool earns its place, and the count is comfortably in the ideal range.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the main content-gate checks and provides hashing support for honest lastmod decisions. Broader content QA checks like metadata validation or broken-link detection are absent, but those are outside the server's apparent specialization.