mcp-server-contentgate
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-server-contentgate
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with WordPress sites over MCP, providing read-only tools for AEO/GEO readiness, AI visibility, traffic, request logs, bot identification, page checks, and schema/markdown previews, plus opt-in write tools to draft, edit, and publish posts with permission checks and auditing.2GPL 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables editorial content QA over the Model Context Protocol with four local tools that analyze readability, AI-sounding language, SEO on-page factors, and produce full reports where every finding includes an actionable fix.41MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceChecks what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and 50+ other AI crawlers can read on a site and what its access policy allows, checks whether a page permits search, answers, training or agent use (with a signed receipt), generates llms.txt, robots.txt and JSON-LD, and reads your Answer Analysis. Nine tools for Claude Desktop, Cursor and other MCP clients.9698 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to capture screenshots, run visual diffs, accessibility audits, and batch sweep plans for web pages via MCP tools.33 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides deterministic editorial tools over MCP for creating briefs, reviewing citations and drafts, comparing revisions, suggesting internal links, and planning content refreshes using supplied evidence.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to audit URLs or raw HTML for SEO, AEO, and GEO performance, generate llms.txt manifests, and check the tool version via MCP tools.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct content-quality dimension: keyword presence, translation structure, internal linking, advertising claims, sitemap lastmod dating, and hashing. Even the two hashing-related tools are cleanly separated as utility versus policy. No tool appears to duplicate another.
Four tools follow a clear check_<object> pattern, but sitemap_lastmod and content_hash break the verb-first convention and read as nouns. The mixed style is still readable and predictable enough for moderate coherence.
Six tools is well-scoped for a content-gate server, covering distinct compliance checks plus hashing support. Each tool earns its place, and the count is comfortably in the ideal range.
The tool surface covers the main content-gate checks and provides hashing support for honest lastmod decisions. Broader content QA checks like metadata validation or broken-link detection are absent, but those are outside the server's apparent specialization.