NASA SciX MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to NASA SciX MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with the SciX (formerly NASA ADS) API to search scientific literature, export citations, and analyze bibliometric data. It supports advanced tools for managing libraries, resolving astronomical object names, and exploring citation networks.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceProvides seamless access to the NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS) for searching astronomical papers, tracking citations and metrics, managing paper libraries, and exporting BibTeX references through natural language conversation.108MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching the NASA Astrophysics Data System literature with full ADS query syntax, retrieving complete paper records, and exploring citation and reference graphs.247 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables agents to search, analyze, and explore arXiv academic papers with advanced multi-field search, author lookup, category browsing, citation extraction, and bibliography export.29 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceProvides access to the Elsevier Scopus API, enabling AI assistants to search for academic papers, retrieve detailed abstracts, and look up author profiles. It facilitates bibliometric research and scholarly data analysis through natural language commands.5107 PyPI44MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables agents to search papers across Semantic Scholar and arXiv, read and extract text from arXiv PDFs, align records across sources, and produce structured literature-analysis digests.101-
TDQS
Scored across 21 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation or resource. There is clear separation between library management, document operations, annotations, search, metrics, and citation/reference retrieval. No observable overlap or ambiguity.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_library, delete_annotation). Exceptions are 'export' (verb only) and 'library_operation' (noun_noun), which break the pattern slightly. Overall, the naming is clear and predictable.
With 21 tools covering search, libraries, annotations, citations, metrics, permissions, and export, the scope is well-supported. Each tool serves a distinct purpose without redundancy, and the count is appropriate for a full-featured literature API.
The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for managing and querying scientific literature: CRUD for libraries and annotations, search (including documentation), citations (forward and backward), metrics, and export. No obvious gaps are apparent for the domain.