Skip to main content
Glama
adriangrahldev

Advanced Trello MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Advanced Trello MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI assistants with access to Trello's functionality. This server enables AI models to interact with Trello boards, lists, and cards programmatically.
      267 npm
      1
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides tools for interacting with Trello boards, enabling seamless management of cards, lists, and activities while handling rate limiting and type safety.
      35
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Trello that works with any MCP-compatible client -- Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and more. Provides 46 tools covering boards, cards, lists, labels, checklists, attachments, members, custom fields, and search.
      45
      154 npm
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    D1.5/5.0

    Scored across 32 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools have unclear boundaries, such as add-comment vs add-comments, archive-card vs archive-cards, and create-card vs create-cards, which could cause confusion. While some tools target distinct resources (e.g., get-boards vs get-list-cards), the overlapping singular/plural pairs and vague purposes like delete-action vs update-action reduce clarity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a mostly consistent verb_noun pattern with hyphens, such as create-card, get-boards, and update-label. However, there are minor deviations like get-tickets-by-list (which uses 'tickets' instead of 'cards') and inconsistent handling of plurals (e.g., add-comment vs add-comments), slightly affecting predictability.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 32 tools, the count is too high for the Trello domain, leading to redundancy and bloat. Many tools could be consolidated (e.g., singular and plural versions), making the set feel heavy and overwhelming for typical agent workflows, despite covering a broad scope.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers core CRUD operations for boards, lists, cards, labels, and actions, but there are notable gaps, such as missing tools for managing board settings or user permissions. The inclusion of redundant tools (e.g., multiple archive/move variants) does not fill these gaps, leaving the surface somewhat incomplete for advanced Trello management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues