Skip to main content
Glama
adjurtime

163 Mail MCP

by adjurtime
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python

Related Servers

Alternatives to 163 Mail MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • email-mcp

      swapnilsurdi
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local MCP server for multi-account IMAP/SMTP email (iCloud + Gmail via app-specific passwords). Never marks mail read. Cross-folder search, idempotent sends, TLS verified.
      8
      MIT

    • mailpouch

      chandshy
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents permission-gated, audit-logged access to private email providers (Proton Mail via Bridge and plain IMAP), running locally with OAuth-based authentication and human-controlled escalation for destructive operations.
      66
      60 npm
      11
      MIT

    • QCH-Hermes

      seenark
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-hosted Gmail gateway MCP server that enables searching and fetching emails from multiple authorized Gmail mailboxes via a single backend authorization boundary.
      -

    • MailMesh MCP

      culpen90
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A private, single-user MCP server that unifies Gmail, Microsoft 365/Outlook, and IMAP mailboxes for LLMs to search and read emails live, without storing or caching mailbox contents.
      -

    • mcp-mail

      PilarJ
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing read and send access to a single IMAP/SMTP mailbox over Streamable HTTP with GitHub OAuth authentication, featuring recipient allowlists for security, email reading/searching/threading, attachments, drafts, folder management, and sending/reply tools.
      MIT

    • multi-mail-mcp

      claygeo
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server for agents that need to work across multiple Gmail and Microsoft 365 accounts without cloud token storage.
      6
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct: reading, sending, trashing, moving, search, and batch operations each target different actions. However, move_mail, trash_mail, set_read_state individually overlap conceptually with their batch counterparts, and preview_send/send_mail plus preview_batch_actions/execute_batch_actions form pairs that could cause mis-selection if an agent isn't careful about which stage is needed.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_folders, read_mail, send_mail, trash_mail, move_mail, download_attachments, set_read_state, mail_status). A minor deviation exists with search_mail_headers and the pair preview_batch_actions/execute_batch_actions, which use a descriptive phrase style rather than a single verb, but the overall naming is coherent and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 12 tools, the count is reasonable for a mail MCP server covering read, search, send, move, trash, mark, attachment, batch, and status operations. It sits slightly above the ideal core set but each tool serves a distinct function; a couple of tools could theoretically be merged (e.g., single-action operations could be covered by batch), but the count is well within acceptable bounds.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core mailbox operations: listing folders, status, searching, reading, sending, moving, trashing, marking read state, batch operations, and attachments. Minor gaps include no explicit compose/save-draft tool (preview_send acts as a proxy), no message-level threading/folder management (create/delete folders), and no way to fetch full content beyond a single message, but the main workflows are covered without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources