WCAG Accessibility MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to WCAG Accessibility MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server for WCAG accessibility auditing in AI coding agents, providing tools to audit HTML, files, URLs, and diffs, plus a prompt for React component auditing.52,025 npm6MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI agents with web accessibility analysis tools via MCP, enabling checks for alt text, heading hierarchy, color contrast, ARIA validation, and form accessibility.52 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides conversational, actionable accessibility testing for AI agents, including auditing, prioritization, and code-level fixes.229 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables auditing web pages for WCAG violations, applying deterministic fixes and PRs, all through MCP clients like Claude Desktop.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets an AI agent scan a web page for WCAG accessibility issues and get back findings it can act on.525 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables LLMs to perform web accessibility testing against WCAG standards using Deque Axe-core API and Puppeteer.6266 npm92MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a clear and distinct task: three different methods for auditing (by URL, HTML string, or file), a contrast checker, a contrast fix suggester, an issue explainer, and a checklist retriever. There is no overlap or ambiguity among them.
Tool names mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (audit_url, audit_html, audit_file, check_contrast, explain_issue, get_wcag_checklist). The only minor deviation is 'suggest_contrast_fix', which is a verb_verb_noun but still clear and consistent in style.
7 tools is an ideal number for this domain. Each tool covers a necessary function without unnecessary redundancy: three audit entry points, two contrast helpers, one explainer, and one checklist reference. The scope is well-scoped and focused on WCAG accessibility.
The tool set provides a complete lifecycle for accessibility auditing: multiple ways to ingest content for auditing, contrast analysis and remediation, issue explanation, and a checklist for manual coverage. There are no obvious gaps for the intended use case of assessing and fixing WCAG compliance.