Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to TokLedger

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables importing AI provider usage CSVs or syncing OpenRouter/OpenAI costs into a local SQLite ledger, then querying spend, budgets, and invoice-style summaries via MCP tools.
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first, multi-provider cost meter for LLM usage, exposed as MCP tools. Captures every call into a local SQLite ledger and lets any coding agent query spend, compare providers, and get recommendations — no cloud, no account. First-class support for Chinese providers (Qwen, DeepSeek) alongside Anthropic and OpenAI.
      7
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for querying AI usage metrics (exact tokens, cost, latency, errors, productivity) from a local SQLite database, enabling charts and analysis in Claude Code and Cursor.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that exposes local coding-agent session logs as three tools for introspection of recent work, debugging tool failures, and tracking token usage and estimated cost without parsing log files.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides financial audit reporting and ledger query tools for AI agents, enabling generation of compliance, risk, and transaction reports and querying of transaction data, balances, and summaries from an in-memory SQLite database via MCP.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server that lets local AI agents query bank transactions stored in a local SQLite database, with tools for accounts, transaction search, spending summaries, recurring charges, trends, themes, subscriptions, and store health.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct: stats for aggregate metrics, recent for raw records, model_breakdown for per-model rollup, and cloud_savings for cost comparison. However, tokledger_stats already includes cloud-equivalent cost and percent saved, which overlaps with tokledger_cloud_savings, creating minor ambiguity for cost-focused queries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names share the 'tokledger_' prefix and use consistent snake_case noun phrases. While not verb_noun, the convention is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a ledger analytics server, covering summary, recent records, per-model breakdown, and savings. Each tool has a clear role without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    Core analytical queries are covered, but the surface lacks filtering by date range or model, and no pagination for recent records. These are minor gaps that agents could work around by adjusting N or using aggregate stats.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues