Skip to main content
Glama
adimalkar

ReproGate

by adimalkar
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to ReproGate

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Living Stack MCP — Retired

      equinoxaifinance-rgb
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Retired snapshot of the former 15-tool Apache-2.0 beta. Use Living Stack Community for the free seven-tool proof edition; Complete Local is the paid runtime with memory, recovery, signed traces, release verification, and multi-agent workflows.
      14
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-permission-server

      jigonyoo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enforces fine-grained, context-aware access control on MCP tool calls, with a tamper-evident, replayable audit log that records denials and verifies every decision.
      MIT
    • Verax by verax-ai

      Veraxofficial

      verax-ai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-speaking agents to execute tool calls through an authorization gate, producing signed decision records and reconciled effect rows for accountability.
      6
      Apache 2.0

    • warrant

      mariaangelikabuilds
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that acts as an authorization gateway between an AI agent and external systems, deterministically refusing actions that exceed granted authority and sealing every decision into an auditable chain of custody.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: creating an action envelope with policy evaluation, searching the tool catalog, and explaining previous decisions. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same domain.verb lowercase pattern (action.plan, catalog.search, policy.explain). The naming is uniform, predictable, and clearly groups tools by their domain.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is within the ideal range, and each tool serves a necessary and distinct function in the planning-and-policy workflow. The small set feels intentionally scoped rather than sparse.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset covers the core workflow: discover actionable capabilities, plan an action with deterministic policy evaluation, and explain the resulting decision. As a Phase 1 non-executing gate, no obvious missing operations are present.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources