ReproGate
Related Servers
Alternatives to ReproGate
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceOwner-signed authorization before agent actions. Hosted Vizier v0.5.13 MCP: https://vizier.agendamcp.dpdns.org/mcp. ALLOW/BLOCK/REVIEW; anonymous calls never ALLOW. Your integration enforces the decision. SDK v0.5.13: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@agenda-intelligence/vizier-sdk. Grants are signed; legacy receipts are unsigned. Python stdio is a separate catalog.37 npmMIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables an AI agent to preflight concrete tool calls by recording principal, destination, scope, authority evidence, and relations, allowing only formed actions to execute and producing inspectable evidence receipts.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides a governed execution boundary for AI agents, enforcing deterministic policy, one-shot human approvals, and signed receipts for MCP tool effects.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients and AI agents to discover and invoke only explicitly authorized, resource-bounded operational capabilities through a policy-enforced gateway with confirmation, audit, and isolated executor routing. It separates trusted transport identity from execution and supports declared tools over stdio MCP without exposing generic shell or privileged API surfaces.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceRetired snapshot of the former 15-tool Apache-2.0 beta. Use Living Stack Community for the free seven-tool proof edition; Complete Local is the paid runtime with memory, recovery, signed traces, release verification, and multi-agent workflows.14Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnforces fine-grained, context-aware access control on MCP tool calls, with a tamper-evident, replayable audit log that records denials and verifies every decision.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action: creating an action envelope with policy evaluation, searching the tool catalog, and explaining previous decisions. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their purposes.
All tool names follow the same domain.verb lowercase pattern (action.plan, catalog.search, policy.explain). The naming is uniform, predictable, and clearly groups tools by their domain.
Three tools is within the ideal range, and each tool serves a necessary and distinct function in the planning-and-policy workflow. The small set feels intentionally scoped rather than sparse.
The toolset covers the core workflow: discover actionable capabilities, plan an action with deterministic policy evaluation, and explain the resulting decision. As a Phase 1 non-executing gate, no obvious missing operations are present.