Skip to main content
Glama
adimalkar

ReproGate

by adimalkar
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to ReproGate

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Agent Action Preflight v1

      jinen-project
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an AI agent to preflight concrete tool calls by recording principal, destination, scope, authority evidence, and relations, allowing only formed actions to execute and producing inspectable evidence receipts.
      1
      MIT

    • veor

      winterbim
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a governed execution boundary for AI agents, enforcing deterministic policy, one-shot human approvals, and signed receipts for MCP tool effects.
      MIT

    • Secure Ops Gateway

      Jakub5Z5
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients and AI agents to discover and invoke only explicitly authorized, resource-bounded operational capabilities through a policy-enforced gateway with confirmation, audit, and isolated executor routing. It separates trusted transport identity from execution and supports declared tools over stdio MCP without exposing generic shell or privileged API surfaces.
      Apache 2.0

    • Living Stack MCP — Retired

      equinoxaifinance-rgb
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Retired snapshot of the former 15-tool Apache-2.0 beta. Use Living Stack Community for the free seven-tool proof edition; Complete Local is the paid runtime with memory, recovery, signed traces, release verification, and multi-agent workflows.
      14
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-permission-server

      jigonyoo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enforces fine-grained, context-aware access control on MCP tool calls, with a tamper-evident, replayable audit log that records denials and verifies every decision.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: creating an action envelope with policy evaluation, searching the tool catalog, and explaining previous decisions. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same domain.verb lowercase pattern (action.plan, catalog.search, policy.explain). The naming is uniform, predictable, and clearly groups tools by their domain.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is within the ideal range, and each tool serves a necessary and distinct function in the planning-and-policy workflow. The small set feels intentionally scoped rather than sparse.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset covers the core workflow: discover actionable capabilities, plan an action with deterministic policy evaluation, and explain the resulting decision. As a Phase 1 non-executing gate, no obvious missing operations are present.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources