Skip to main content
Glama
adi0ri

gateway_lab.mcp_server

by adi0ri
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to gateway_lab.mcp_server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • voice-agent-mcp

      irakli-ardia
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Serves a single set of typed, validated tool definitions to MCP clients over stdio, letting them perform real actions through one controlled executor. The same definitions power a speech-driven OpenAI tool-calling agent, so voice and MCP clients share identical, validated capabilities.
      MIT

    • Easy MCP Server

      joshwyatt
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A simple toolkit for creating MCP servers with stdio and SSE transport, auto-validating tools via Pydantic.
      MIT

    • paperclip-mcp

      shanewiseman
      F
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Schema-driven MCP server that exposes all Paperclip API operations as typed MCP tools over stdio or Streamable HTTP, supporting both authenticated and local_mode deployments.
      100
      -

    • Schema Sentinel

      SanjoyDat1
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      An MCP server that validates tool calls against JSON Schema, performs deterministic repair, redacts secrets, and maintains a hash-chained audit ledger.
      -
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools perform clearly separate operations: retrieving a customer record versus triggering a refund. There is no functional overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the same snake_case verb_noun pattern (get_customer_record, trigger_refund). The naming is concise, predictable, and consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is at the low end of what feels useful; for a mock lab it may be intentional, but the surface is thin. Each tool earns its place, but there is little room for broader workflows.

    Completeness2/5

    The server covers a single lookup and a single action, with no way to list customers, check refund status, or cancel/reverse a refund. Agents would hit dead ends for any multi-step workflow beyond a simple demo.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources