Skip to main content
Glama
adhidevara

Priva-MCP

by adhidevara

Related Servers

Alternatives to Priva-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP proxy that pseudo-anonymizes PII before data reaches external AI providers like Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini.
      18
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP proxy that sits in front of bank tool servers, letting AI agents make read-only calls like balances and transactions while blocking payments, writes, renamed tools and argument smuggling. Each denial produces an Ed25519-signed receipt that can be verified offline.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Acts as an in-line protective proxy for Claude and MCP clients, enabling secret redaction, SSRF and path-traversal blocking, destructive-command prevention, prompt-injection scanning, and tamper-evident audit logging with sub-millisecond overhead.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP server enabling Claude to query bank accounts, balances, and transactions through Plaid with OAuth and TLS.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Proxy that wraps any MCP server and masks PII in outbound tool-call arguments before they reach the backend tool, restoring the originals in the results. Covers generic PII plus Indian identifiers (Aadhaar, PAN, GSTIN, UPI, IFSC, ABHA) that most detectors miss.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Self-healing API proxy MCP that sends REST requests, diagnoses failures using Claude, patches requests, and retries. Successful fixes are remembered for instant reuse.
      4
      4 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Both tools target distinct resources: one retrieves a customer profile, the other a financial report. There is no overlap, and each has a clear purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the same 'get_<noun>' pattern, making it predictable and easy for an agent to understand the action and resource.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server is at the lower boundary of acceptable scope. While focused, it may feel thin for a comprehensive customer data server.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface only covers read operations. Common operations like listing customers, updating profiles, or handling account statements are missing, leaving notable gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues