verify_action

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose safety and behavior. It only indicates a read-like operation ('verify') but does not mention side effects, idempotency, or whether the action must be completed. Output schema exists but description does not clarify return structure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that is front-loaded and to the point. No wasted words, though additional details could be included. Still efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple verification tool with one parameter and an output schema, the description hints at usage but does not describe the output (e.g., success/failure, details). Leaves some gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage, and the description only clarifies the ID format ('act-… record id') without explaining the parameter's purpose or constraints. Minimal added meaning beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states specific action: verify outcome of a previously executed action, using a record ID. Clearly distinguishes from siblings like execute_action (runs action) and list_available_actions (lists actions).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies use after executing an action but does not explicitly state when to use versus alternatives. No guidance on prerequisites or cases to avoid, leaving the agent to infer context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.