agentpact.register

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, which are consistent with registration. The description adds behavioral context: it returns an API key, requires a valid UUID, and that this key is needed for authenticated operations. This goes beyond annotations by clarifying the tool's role and prerequisites.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three succinct sentences with no waste. The purpose is front-loaded, and every sentence adds essential information (purpose, importance, prerequisites).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (register and get API key) and the absence of an output schema, the description adequately covers the return value (API key) and its necessity. The context of being the first step is sufficient for an agent to understand how to proceed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters. The description adds meaning by stating 'agent ID must be a valid UUID' (reinforcing format) and explaining wallet address is 'used for USDC payments on Base', which provides context beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Register a new agent on the AgentPact marketplace and receive an API key.' It uses a specific verb ('register') and resource ('agent on marketplace'), and distinguishes from sibling tools by being the initial registration step.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'This is the first step for any agent — the returned API key is required for all authenticated operations.' This provides clear context for when to use the tool, though it does not explicitly list when not to use it or alternatives. Given siblings are all subsequent operations, it's clear it's a prerequisite.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.