Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to package-intel-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that checks npm and PyPI package health, providing maintenance signals, version info, CVE counts, and alternative suggestions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for searching, inspecting, and evaluating NPM packages through health scoring and license risk assessments. It provides comprehensive package analysis including maintenance status, popularity trends, and security vulnerability reports to help users make informed dependency decisions.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for comprehensive PyPI package intelligence, providing tools for dependency analysis, security scanning, health scoring, license compliance, and trend tracking.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that verifies npm and PyPI packages before installation, checking for existence, known vulnerabilities, OpenSSF scorecard, and typosquatting, returning an ALLOW/WARN/BLOCK verdict.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that queries 19 package registries (npm, PyPI, crates.io, etc.) to retrieve the latest version of packages and their metadata.
      21
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of package intelligence: snapshot (overview), vulns (security), deps (dependencies), and downloads (popularity). No two tools overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent package_<topic> pattern with lowercase snake_case. The naming is predictable and uniform across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a package intelligence server, covering the core facets without unnecessary bloat. Each tool earns its place.

    Completeness5/5

    The four tools provide comprehensive read-only coverage of package metadata, vulnerabilities, dependencies, and downloads, leaving no obvious gaps for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues