Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to weeek-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for WEEEK Public API v1 enabling management of tasks, projects, boards, tags, custom fields, time tracking, and CRM entities.
      100
      35 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for the Weeek Public API. Use it from Cursor or Claude Code to browse projects, search tasks, read attachments, and (with a browser session) load task comments.
      35 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to manage Super Productivity tasks, projects, and tags via its Local REST API, including task creation, updates, starting, stopping, archiving, and reading status and Focus Mode state.
      16
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Full-featured MCP server integrating all 71 endpoints of the Weeek API as MCP tools for AI clients, enabling task, project, and workspace management via natural language.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code and OpenAI Codex to interact with the Weeek task tracker through natural language, covering task creation, searching, updating, moving, completing, commenting, and file attachments via thirteen curated tools.
      30 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 35 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes with detailed descriptions that cross-reference related tools. A few pairs could be confused (e.g., move_task vs add_task_to_project, manage_time_entry vs task_timer), but the descriptions generally clarify the boundaries.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names use a consistent snake_case with the weeek_ prefix and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (list_, manage_, get_, create_, update_, delete_, add_, remove_, set_, move_, etc.). Minor deviations like 'whoami' and 'task_timer' break the pattern, and 'manage_' is used for multi-action tools, but overall the convention is predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 35 tools, the surface is heavy for a single MCP server, exceeding the typical 3-15 range. However, the breadth of the task management domain (projects, tasks, boards, columns, comments, custom fields, tags, time tracking, attachments, members, assignments, portfolios) justifies many of them, though some consolidation could still reduce the count.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers core CRUD and lifecycle operations for most entities: projects, tasks, boards, columns, comments, custom fields, tags, time entries, attachments, assignees, watchers, and portfolios. Notable gaps include no list operation for time entries or attachments (only create/get), and no direct read of a single project or board, but these are minor and workable around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues