Skip to main content
Glama
adakh3
by adakh3

Related Servers

Alternatives to testrails-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables management of TestRail projects, test cases, runs, and results directly through MCP-supported clients. It provides a comprehensive set of tools to interact with the TestRail API for seamless test cycle management within AI environments.
      42
      1,101 npm
      44
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for TestRail that prepares everything needed to generate test cases from Jira tickets, Confluence pages, or free-form specs and pushes them back to TestRail.
      31
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      AI-native Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for TestRail. Lets Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and other AI assistants browse projects, create and update test cases, kick off test runs, and record results through natural-language conversation — with strongly-typed tool schemas and per-project custom field validation that helps LLMs generate valid TestRail requests on the first try.
      28
      1,082 npm
      39
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct TestRail entity or action (project, suite, section, case, run, result, test) with clear boundaries, e.g., add_case vs update_case, list_cases vs get_case, add_result_for_case vs get_results_for_case. No two tools have overlapping purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., add_case, get_run, list_sections). Verbs are imperative (add, get, list, delete, close, update) and nouns are singular entity names. Minor prepositions like 'for_case' are uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Fifteen tools is well-scoped for a TestRail MCP covering core entities: projects, suites, sections, cases, runs, results, and tests. Each tool serves a clear purpose without unnecessary bloat or missing essentials.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides full CRUD for test cases and runs, plus read and list operations for most entities. However, missing create/update/delete for sections and suites are notable gaps that agents would need to work around, though core test workflow is covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues