Skip to main content
Glama
acrylicfiddle

x402tools MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to x402tools MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to call 45 micro-priced utility tools via x402 micropayments on Base, covering search, screenshots, OCR, PDFs, WHOIS, geo-IP, and more without API keys.
      -
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to call pay-per-request AI and web tools—including web-to-Markdown reading, PDF extraction, translation, compliance lookups, domain/email/Solana data, and prediction-market intelligence—without accounts or API keys, settling each call in USDC via x402 on Base, Solana, or Arc.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to discover, pay for, and invoke x402-priced services such as document OCR, document analysis, media transcription, remote browser sessions, and receive-only email inboxes using USDC on Base, with no API keys and receipt-backed results.
      37
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to call 50+ pay-per-request tools covering onchain and crypto data, web research, security, compliance screening, business intelligence, and infrastructure checks. Payments settle per call in USDC on Base through the x402 protocol with no accounts, API keys, or subscriptions, and the first call is free for new wallets.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct purpose: QR generation (but two variants), screenshots, DNS, document parsing, security screening, email validation, OCR, prospect enrichment, and word stats. The only minor overlap is between qr.generate and qr.generate_styled, but the styling distinction is explicit enough. No tools could be confused despite the varied domains.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tools follow a dotted namespace convention (category.verb), which is somewhat consistent, but the verbs vary: generate, screenshot, lookup, parse, screen, validate, render_pdf, ocr, enrich, wordstats. Some are nouns (screenshot, ocr, wordstats) rather than verbs, and generate_styled mixes into the verb form. The namespace prefixing helps, but verb usage is internally inconsistent across all tools.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eleven tools is well within an appropriate range and each serves a distinct paid utility purpose. This is a pay-per-call API toolkit where breadth across domains is intentional; the count feels well-scoped and not bloated for a general-purpose utility server.

    Completeness4/5

    For a general utility server, the coverage is reasonable, offering generation, capture, lookup, parsing, validation, security, OCR, enrichment, and text analysis. Minor gaps exist: there's no tool to delete/update results (not applicable since stateless), and no obvious companion for image.screenshot (e.g., file storage) or for document.parse (image extraction). But as a stateless utility surface it feels complete enough for its purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues