agentiam-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| noleakB | Verify execution integrity — detect leaks, injection, unauthorized data flow. ($0.01 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| memguardB | Verify memory/state — detect drift, corruption, unauthorized modifications. ($0.01 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| riskoracleC | Pre-action risk scoring — multi-factor analysis before executing an action. ($0.01 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| secureexecB | Sandboxed tool execution with proof hash. ($0.01 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| flowcoreA | Full orchestration pipeline — chains NoLeak + MemGuard + RiskOracle + SecureExec. ($0.02 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| auditC | OWASP-class code safety audit. ($0.03 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| validateA | Deterministic policy validation — risk + compliance + proof hash. ($0.01 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| risk_checkC | Lightweight risk score by action type/value/leverage. ($0.005 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| researchC | Structured intel brief — web research + analysis. ($0.05 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| intelligence_reportC | Deep DELPHI synthesis — cross-referenced signals. ($0.05 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| delphiC | Real-time intel signals (crypto, AI, DeFi, macro). ($0.01 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| delphi_entityB | Knowledge graph entity lookup + relationships. ($0.01 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| delphi_queryC | Graph query by predicate/subject/object. ($0.01 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| delphi_timelineB | Chronological fact history for any entity. ($0.01 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| delphi_contradictionsC | Conflicting intelligence detection. ($0.01 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| latest_signalsC | Cheapest entry — latest signals across all categories. ($0.001 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| signal_queryA | Query signals by type/severity/keyword/time. ($0.002 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
| publish_signalB | Publish a signal — earn 70% of downstream query fees. ($0.005 USDC per call on Base, via x402.) |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, especially the delphi_* cluster with specific query types. However, 'delphi' and 'latest_signals' both deal with real-time signals and could cause confusion, though descriptions differentiate them. Similarly, 'risk_check' and 'riskoracle' overlap in risk assessment but with different scopes. Overall, agents can likely select the correct tool with careful reading.
Naming uses a mix of conventions: single words ('audit', 'research'), concatenated words ('flowcore', 'riskoracle'), and underscores ('delphi_entity', 'risk_check'). The delphi_* tools follow a consistent pattern, but the rest do not follow a uniform verb_noun or other clear pattern. This mixed style reduces predictability.
18 tools is on the higher side but reasonable for the broad domain covering security audits, intelligence signals, risk analysis, and execution verification. Each tool serves a specific function, and the count does not feel excessive given the scope. However, a slight reduction could improve coherence.
The tool set covers most core workflows: signal querying, publishing, risk assessment, verification, and orchestration. Minor gaps exist, such as lacking signal update/delete tools and possibly entity management for the knowledge graph. Overall, the surface is largely complete for security and intelligence tasks.