apidog-tests-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to apidog-tests-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that provides 22 tools to manage Apidog API documentation, including importing OpenAPI specs, exporting, diffing, analyzing, and bulk-editing endpoints.2213 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for reading, writing, and organizing API documentation in Apidog.126 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Allure TestOps that enables test case management operations like searching, creating, deleting, and updating test cases, scenarios, issues, and custom fields.303 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that automates Playwright-based UI and API testing, supporting test case generation from requirements or API specs, and execution with detailed reports.3 npm1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for executing MySQL SQL, managing Apifox API documentation, and parsing/executing curl commands.6310 npmISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA standalone MCP server for API testing and management, allowing AI assistants to interact with RESTful APIs through natural language.10 npm28MIT
TDQS
Scored across 30 tools
Each tool targets a distinct entity and action (e.g., create vs. list vs. update for test cases, scenarios, suites, data, folders). There is no ambiguity between tools like create_test_case and create_test_cases_bulk because the bulk variant is clearly separate.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_test_case, list_test_scenarios, get_endpoint_statistics). No mixing of styles or irregular verbs.
With 30 tools, the count is on the higher side but justified by the broad domain covering CRUD for multiple entities and metadata listings. However, it exceeds the typical 3-15 range, making it slightly heavy.
The tool set covers most CRUD operations for test cases, scenarios, suites, and data, but lacks tools for updating or deleting suite folders, and there is no tool to trigger test runs or view results. These gaps could hinder full workflow automation.