Skip to main content
Glama
abrahamhl

MCP OSINT Server

by abrahamhl
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP OSINT Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • osint-mcp-server

      badchars
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with 37 OSINT tools and 12 data sources to perform unified reconnaissance, domain analysis, and attack surface mapping. It enables agents to query, correlate, and reason across platforms like Shodan, VirusTotal, and Censys in parallel.
      37
      174 npm
      55
      MIT

    • mrholmes

      SSGREAPER
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to execute OSINT tasks from 88 catalogued repositories through safe command surfaces, supporting authorized research and threat intelligence workflows.
      1
      MIT

    • domain-intel-mcp

      On13uka
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run domain-intelligence investigations through six free tools: sanctions screening, IP geolocation with VPN/Tor detection, email validation with breach status, company profiling, WHOIS and email-security scoring, and a single-call domain dossier.
      2 npm
      MIT

    • subsweep-recon

      1nc0gn30
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform live subdomain enumeration, passive DNS OSINT, technology stack profiling, port scanning, and B2B lead harvesting directly from chat.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct OSINT capability (sanctions screening, vulnerability brief, evidence verification, sun position, IOC search), with minimal overlap. The only potential confusion is between evidence_verify and chronolocate_sun (both verification-related), but they operate at different levels of abstraction.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use snake_case, but the word order varies: sanctions_screen (noun+verb), cve_brief (noun+noun), evidence_verify (noun+verb), chronolocate_sun (verb+noun), ioc_search (noun+verb). There is no consistent verb_noun pattern, making it mixed but still readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is within the ideal 3–15 range. Each addresses a distinct need without redundancy, making the set well-scoped for a focused OSINT toolkit.

    Completeness2/5

    For an OSINT server, the surface lacks many standard capabilities such as DNS/WHOIS lookups, domain/IP enrichment, social media search, and reverse image search. While it covers sanctions, CVE, IOC, and verification, these gaps will likely cause agent failures on common OSINT tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources