ledfx_apply_global

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that the tool affects all active effects by default and can filter by virtuals. However, with no annotations, it lacks detail on side effects, persistence, or authorization needs. It adequately conveys the core behavior but not comprehensively.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that front-loads the key purpose and optional filtering. No filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and 7 parameters, the description covers the primary function but lacks guidance on usage scenarios, return values, or behavioral nuances. It is adequate but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description restates parameter names (gradient, brightness, etc.) but adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's own descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool applies global configuration (gradient, brightness, etc.) to all active effects, with optional filtering by virtual IDs. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like ledfx_apply_global_effect, which likely targets a single effect.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not explain trade-offs with siblings like ledfx_set_effect or ledfx_apply_global_effect, nor does it specify prerequisites or limitations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.