Skip to main content
Glama
abnersajr
by abnersajr

Related Servers

Alternatives to Readedit

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that reduces AI agent token usage by up to 90% through intelligent context compression. Enables efficient code exploration, multi-file refactoring, and debugging by providing tools for smart reading, searching, and managing code context.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that keeps language server sessions warm and routes multiple languages through one process. Agents get persistent cross-file awareness, speculative execution (simulate edits before writing to disk), and 20 skills that encode correct multi-step operations like safe rename, blast-radius analysis, and end-to-end refactoring. Single Go binary, no runtime dependencies.
      50
      126
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Agent-optimized MCP server that replaces built-in file, search, exec, and git tools with compact, structured JSON equivalents. Benchmarked 20–45% token savings for AI coding agents.
      20
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server connecting Claude/Cursor to Codex CLI, enabling code analysis via @ file references, multi-turn conversations, sandboxed edits, and structured change mode.
      13
      282 npm
      24
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: multi_edit for editing multiple files (no reading), multi_read_edit for reading and optionally editing multiple files, and read_edit for single-file read+edit. No overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case: multi_edit, multi_read_edit, read_edit. The naming clearly communicates the function (edit vs read_edit) and scope (multi vs single).

    Tool Count4/5

    With only 3 tools, the set is minimal but well-scoped for the server's focused purpose of reading and editing files. It's slightly on the low end but still reasonable.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers all expected operations: reading, editing, single-file, multi-file, and combined read+edit. No obvious gaps for the stated domain of file editing.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues