Skip to main content
Glama
MCP Trace Inspector

MCP Trace Inspector

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Trace Inspector

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI agents access to your application's OpenTelemetry traces for querying, analysis, and debugging.
      5
      11 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that exposes Hatchet client / REST observability APIs to coding agents across multiple environments from one process.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Unified MCP server for observability and monitoring, providing tools to query metrics, logs, and traces through Prometheus, Grafana, Loki, and Jaeger.
      2
      Mozilla Public 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-hosted OpenTelemetry backend in one Go binary. Its MCP server exposes tools for service health, latency, topology, trace inspection, log search, read-only SQL over traces, logs and metrics, and dashboards.
      11
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct analytical purposes (failure_report, tool_stats, security_audit, span_tree, slowest_spans, etc.), but token_usage and compare_runs overlap in cost/token/latency aggregation, and recent_activity vs list_runs both surface recent runs/spans, which could cause occasional misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 12 tools use a consistent snake_case noun_phrase or verb_noun pattern (failure_report, tool_stats, list_runs, run_summary, span_tree), making names predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each targets a specific diagnostic need (failures, stats, security, activity, comparison, runs, summary, tree, latency, approvals, tokens, search).

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers run listing, summaries, span trees, failures, latency, tokens, security, approvals, search, and comparison—strong lifecycle coverage for trace inspection. Minor gaps like deleting/exporting traces or filtering by date/tool in list_runs are workaround-able but not critical.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues