MCP Trace Inspector
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Trace Inspector
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server exposing AI agent observability tools: list, inspect, and deterministically replay recorded agent execution traces for debugging failures.143 PyPIApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for AI agent observability, providing trace and span logging, search, latency/tokens/cost metrics, and anomaly detection using an in-memory buffer.653 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI agents access to your application's OpenTelemetry traces for querying, analysis, and debugging.511 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that exposes Hatchet client / REST observability APIs to coding agents across multiple environments from one process.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceUnified MCP server for observability and monitoring, providing tools to query metrics, logs, and traces through Prometheus, Grafana, Loki, and Jaeger.2Mozilla Public 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceSelf-hosted OpenTelemetry backend in one Go binary. Its MCP server exposes tools for service health, latency, topology, trace inspection, log search, read-only SQL over traces, logs and metrics, and dashboards.11Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
Most tools have distinct analytical purposes (failure_report, tool_stats, security_audit, span_tree, slowest_spans, etc.), but token_usage and compare_runs overlap in cost/token/latency aggregation, and recent_activity vs list_runs both surface recent runs/spans, which could cause occasional misselection.
All 12 tools use a consistent snake_case noun_phrase or verb_noun pattern (failure_report, tool_stats, list_runs, run_summary, span_tree), making names predictable and readable.
12 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each targets a specific diagnostic need (failures, stats, security, activity, comparison, runs, summary, tree, latency, approvals, tokens, search).
The surface covers run listing, summaries, span trees, failures, latency, tokens, security, approvals, search, and comparison—strong lifecycle coverage for trace inspection. Minor gaps like deleting/exporting traces or filtering by date/tool in list_runs are workaround-able but not critical.