bolna_delete_disposition

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It states that the action is permanent, which is useful, but does not disclose what happens if the disposition does not exist, whether a confirmation step exists, or any authorization requirements. The behavioral insight is minimal beyond the obvious destructive nature.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence with no extraneous words. Front-loaded with the action and resource. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple deletion tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is nearly complete. It conveys the core action and key input. However, it could improve by noting that deletion is irreversible or adding error behavior, but it is already sufficient for an agent to decide confidently.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with the only parameter 'disposition_id' already described as 'UUID of the disposition to delete'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond restating 'by its ID'. Baseline of 3 is appropriate given full schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'delete', the resource 'disposition', and the identifier 'by its ID'. It distinguishes well from sibling tools like bolna_create_disposition, bolna_update_disposition, and bolna_list_dispositions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for permanent deletion and should be used when a specific disposition must be removed. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives like bolna_bulk_create_dispositions, which might have related functionality. No guidance on prerequisites or consequences.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.