loki_get_phlebo_day_tasks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, covering core behavioral traits. The description adds context about the output contents but does not disclose additional behaviors like rate limits or data freshness. It does not contradict annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences: the first explains what the tool returns, the second states its use case. No redundant or unnecessary information. Front-loaded with the most important details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has only two parameters with full schema coverage, read-only annotations, and no output schema, the description is adequate. It covers the output structure and purpose. Could be improved by noting that the timeline is for a single rider on a single day, which is implicit but not explicit.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the schema descriptions are clear. The description does not add parameter-specific details beyond what the schema provides, so it meets the baseline expectation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('get') and resource ('chronological day timeline for one phlebo/rider'), listing the contents (shift start, login, tasks) and purpose (debug route/sequence). It clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like loki_get_phlebo_actual_route and loki_get_phlebo_planned_route.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states when to use the tool ('Use to debug a rider's route/sequence on a specific day'). It does not mention when not to use or list alternatives, but the context is clear enough for an AI to infer usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.